GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 122% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 120 GB more memory, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 522 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 70% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GM204 | Haswell GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 52.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |