GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 56 GB more memory, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 372 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GM204 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro M1200
- GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro K2200
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro M1200
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K2200
- GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GRID M6 8Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2