GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro 2000M
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro 2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Quadro 2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 81% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 172 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 4112 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M6 8Q and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | − |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GRID M6 8Q and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Quadro 2000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | Fermi |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 17.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | 2.1 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |