GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon Pro 455
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 455, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 455 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro 455 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 455.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 133 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro 455 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GM204 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 41.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |