GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 133 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |