GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Pro WX 4150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 4150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 85% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 65% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |