GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 733% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 314% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 157% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 254% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Bristol Ridge |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3100 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |