GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon R7 M270DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M6 8Q stacks up against Radeon R7 M270DX, check out specs charts below.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon R7 M270DX
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 178 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 205% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Topaz |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |