GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 52% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 75% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GM204 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro M1200
- GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro K2200
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro M1200
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro K2200
- GRID M6 8Q vs GeForce MX150
- GRID M6 8Q vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q