GRID M6 8Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID M6 8Q

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID M6 8Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
QHD / 1440p	5−6	1−2
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	35−40	30−33
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	27−30	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	8−9	1−2
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	60−65	45−50
medium / 1080p	30−35	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID M6 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	220−230	200−210
medium / 768p	190−200	170−180
ultra / 1080p	110−120	90−95
QHD / 1440p	75−80	50−55
4K / 2160p	40−45	24−27
high / 768p	160−170	130−140
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	90−95
ultra / 1080p	75−80	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	20−22	14−16
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	27−30	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	110−120	95−100
medium / 1080p	65−70	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 22% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	10−12	6−7
low / 720p	60−65	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	95−100	80−85
medium / 768p	85−90	70−75
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
QHD / 1440p	5−6	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	10−12	8−9
ultra / 1080p	9−10	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	65−70	50−55
medium / 768p	40−45	30−35
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.

Full Specs

	GRID M6 8Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GM204	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	30 August 2015	15 August 2020
Pipelines	1536	96
Core clock speed	722 MHz
Transistor count	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	69.31
Floating-point performance	2,218 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	6.4
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	5.2
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID M6 8Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares