FirePro M4100 vs GRID M60 1Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4100 and GRID M60 1Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4100 stacks up against GRID M60 1Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 1Q
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4100 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 113 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro M4100 and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 422% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−105 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 268% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 528% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |