GeForce GTX 850M vs GRID M60 1Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 850M and GRID M60 1Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 850M and GRID M60 1Q.
GRID M60 1Q
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | GRID M60 1Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 850M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GTX 850M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- GeForce GTX 850M and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 850M | GRID M60 1Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N15P-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.08 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |