GeForce MX250 vs GRID M60 1Q
When comparing GeForce MX250 and GRID M60 1Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX250 and GRID M60 1Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 1Q
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250 | GRID M60 1Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 961 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID M60 1Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 65% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 51% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 68% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce MX250. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX250 | GRID M60 1Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-G2 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |