GRID M60 1Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GRID M60 1Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 1Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M60 1Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 122% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 314% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 213% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 284% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GM204 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 1Q vs Quadro K4200
- GRID M60 1Q vs GeForce GTX 775M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K4200
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 775M
- GRID M60 1Q vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GRID M60 1Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2