GRID M60 1Q vs Quadro K2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 1Q stacks up against Quadro K2000M, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 1Q
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 188 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 3212 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 422% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID M60 1Q and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 268% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 243% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 30% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 528% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |