GRID M60 1Q vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 1Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 481 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1197 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |