GRID M60 1Q vs Quadro M500M
When choosing between GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M500M.
GRID M60 1Q
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro M500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M500M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 472 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 1008 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 337% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 114% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 660% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 268% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 450% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro M500M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 15 December 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4004 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |