GRID M60 1Q vs Quadro M520
In this comparison between GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 1Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro M520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 800% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 199 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 52% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 102% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 83% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 117% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Quadro M520 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1019 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |