GRID M60 1Q vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 460.
GRID M60 1Q
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 343 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 460. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |