GRID M60 1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
When comparing GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro WX 4130, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 1Q
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- GRID M60 1Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 93% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 72% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GM204 | Polaris |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |