FireStream 9250 vs GRID M60 2Q
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and GRID M60 2Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 2Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
GRID M60 2Q
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- GRID M60 2Q has 50% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M60 2Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3026 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GRID M60 2Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 121% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 411% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 295% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | RV770 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |