GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GRID M60 2Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M60 2Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M60 2Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 2Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID M60 2Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 7 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M60 2Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 4062 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 165% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 224 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |