GeForce MX330 vs GRID M60 2Q
In this comparison between GeForce MX330 and GRID M60 2Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX330 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 2Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX330 | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX330 and GRID M60 2Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 974 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GRID M60 2Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 1988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX330. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX330 | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |