GeForce MX450 vs GRID M60 2Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 2Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 2Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 2Q
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID M60 2Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 2Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 838 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID M60 2Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 4990 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID M60 2Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 5.2 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |