GRID M60 2Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 2Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 2Q
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GM204 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 2Q vs GeForce GTX 670
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon HD 7970
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7970
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GRID M60 2Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2