GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro 3000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro 3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 2Q stacks up against Quadro 3000M, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 2Q
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 2Q and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 107 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 4387 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 2Q and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GM204 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |