GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro K3100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K3100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K3100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 2Q
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 149 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K3100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 1812 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 155% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |