GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro M2200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 137 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 496 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 2Q and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2200. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro M2200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GM204 | N17P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 694 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5508 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |