GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon R7 M270
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R7 M270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 268 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GM204 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |