GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon R9 M385X
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R9 M385X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M385X has 2 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 543 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R9 M385X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3512 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GM204 | Strato-XT-M3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |