GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
When choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon RX 480 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon RX 480 mobile.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 6 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 2988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 156% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 151% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 128% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 173% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 195% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1077 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 155.1 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |