GRID M60 2Q vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than GRID M60 2Q.
GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 17 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID M60 2Q is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
6−7
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID M60 2Q and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
65−70
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GRID M60 2Q and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GM204
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
30 August 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
2048
448
Core clock speed
557 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
150.8
32.14
Floating-point performance
4,833 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
267 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.4 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
5.2
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
