FirePro W4190M vs GRID M60 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4190M and GRID M60 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4190M and GRID M60 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 8Q
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 268 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 88% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 416% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 184% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |