FireStream 9270 vs GRID M60 8Q

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and GRID M60 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against GRID M60 8Q, check out specs charts below.

FireStream 9270

GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M60 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

GRID M60 8Q has 40% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 193 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	20−22
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	8−9	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	27−30	85−90
4K / 2160p	12−14	45−50
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	18−20	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 171% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	10−12	40−45
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	6−7
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	5−6	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 169% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	70−75
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID M60 8Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	RV770	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	30 August 2015
Pipelines	800	2048
Core clock speed	750 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	150.8
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FireStream 9270 vs GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares