FireStream 9370 vs GRID M60 8Q
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GRID M60 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 268 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Cypress | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |