GeForce 940M vs GRID M60 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940M and GRID M60 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940M stacks up against GRID M60 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940M is 515 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce 940M and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940M and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 104% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 420% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 237% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |