GeForce GT 640M vs GRID M60 8Q
When comparing GeForce GT 640M and GRID M60 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 640M and GRID M60 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 603% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- GeForce GT 640M and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 640M and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 293% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 860% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 70% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N13P-GS | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 645 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |