GeForce GTX 295 vs GRID M60 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GRID M60 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against GRID M60 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
GRID M60 8Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 28% more power consumption, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 685 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 8Q is 257 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 4013 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GT200B | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |