GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GRID M60 8Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID M60 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and GRID M60 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GRID M60 8Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 743 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 8Q is 259 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3312 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GF104 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 288 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |