GeForce GTX 670M vs GRID M60 8Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 670M and GRID M60 8Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and GRID M60 8Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 41 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |