GeForce GTX 675M vs GRID M60 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 675M and GRID M60 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 675M will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | GRID M60 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 675M is 63 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3512 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | GRID M60 8Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GS1 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |