GeForce MX150 vs GRID M60 8Q
When choosing between GeForce MX150 and GRID M60 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX150 and GRID M60 8Q.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 911 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 996 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 62% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 53% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 77% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 65% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |