GeForce MX450 vs GRID M60 8Q
When choosing between GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 8Q.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5,GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
- GeForce MX450 is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 838 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 4990 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX450 and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce MX450. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX450 | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 5.2 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |