GRID M60 8Q vs HD Graphics 530
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and HD Graphics 530 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 530 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | HD Graphics 530 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 530 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 530 has 56 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 530 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 530 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 207 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 530 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 8Q and HD Graphics 530 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 108% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 237% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 33% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | HD Graphics 530 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GM204 | Skylake GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |