GRID M60 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 640, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 24 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 78% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GM204 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K2200M
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K5000
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2200M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K5000
- GRID M60 8Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GRID M60 8Q vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M