GRID M60 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 120 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 357 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 105% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GM204 | Haswell GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 52.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |