GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro 4000M
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Quadro 4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro 4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 82 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3812 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 342% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 184% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GM204 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |