GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K1000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 293 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 296% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 468% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K1000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | N14P-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |