GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K4100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K4100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K4100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 149 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1812 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 62% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 59% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 65% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro K4100M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 706 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |