GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro P3200
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro P3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6084 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6076 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 151 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 1996 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 94% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 106% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 74% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 118% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 121% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 109% more, than GRID M60 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro P3200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GM204 | N18E-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 27 February 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |